Oxygen Basic
Information => Open Forum => Topic started by: Aurel on December 29, 2013, 12:40:11 AM
-
Idea and Charles work on C emiter is ok and fine for many things and i agree
BUT
what about C to Oxygen Basic translator ?
Oxygen Basic can use very well some C stayle of code so why not create
this type of translator and on this way spread interest for Oxygen Basic much more.
I'm hope that my idea is not to much stupid... ::)
-
I'm hope that my idea is not to much stupid...
Not stupid, but what I expected as your response.
Hey Charles, Aurel thinks your C emitter idea sucks and you should do a 180 and port everything to 32 bit O2. We should have talked to Aurel sooner. :'(
-
Hey Charles, Aurel thinks your C emitter idea sucks and you should do a 180 and port everything to 32 bit O2
John
Why everything what you say must be a lie ?
I don't say that C emitter sucks
and where you live....still 90% of windows software is 32bit and most windows users
don't care if program is 32 or 64, that is why i love Windows... :P
-
Why everything what you say must be a lie ?
If you purchase the sarcasm upgrade for your translator, my comments won't sound like lies. ::)
-
Oh man...
put the pipe down ;D ;D ;D
-
Why don't you grow up or do the O2 project a favour and remove yourself from this forum. Your negative attitude keeps others from contributing and joining.
-
Hi Aurel,
Porting C code to Oxygen Basic is fairly simple, since it already understands much of C. It might be worth looking at a translator, after we have the C emitter sorted out.
-
Your negative attitude keeps others from contributing and joining.
Is a joke, isn't it?
-
Thanks Charles for understanding.. :)
-
Your negative attitude keeps others from contributing and joining.
Is a joke, isn't it?
No, John is serious. Aurel's trolling and personal attacks have been a major turn off for several of us and have kept several of us from joining the forums. He has made several personal attacks against me on these forums, including calling me a dickhead and a lunatic. On most forums this would be grounds for a permanent ban, but here if there are rules, they evidently do not apply to Aurel as he continues to get away with his behavior. Which goes back to what John said about Aurel's behavior keeping people from joining and contributing. His behavior needs to stop, one way or another.
The work John and Charles have done on C BASIC has finally brought me here and I do not plan on leaving, but I will not tolerate any abuse from Aurel.
-
well well look who is here, and i really don't know who say this :
Kuron Offline
Senior Member
****
Posts: 302
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 2
RE: Double Buffering
And I'll tell you something else, this discussion has left a very bad taste in my mouth for Oxygen Basic.
It is an extremely schizophrenic language with no real identity of its own. I used to think Hot Basic was the most poorly designed language out there, but Oxygen beats it hands down
-
Oxygen supports a wide range of coding styles, more than is normally found in a BASIC implementation, and this makes it harder to trap errors, but I endeavour to keep the language coherent.
-
No, John is serious.
Aurel is a professional TROLL. He has mastered his craft on many forums leaving them as ghost towns of upset users. As long as Charles is willing to tolerate the abuse to his member base, the best we can do is just ignore Aurel and maybe over time he will just go away.
-
well well look who is here, and i really don't know who say this :
Thank you for trying to instigate something and reaffirming my words by doing so.
Aurel is a professional TROLL. He has mastered his craft on many forums leaving them as ghost towns of upset users. As long as Charles is willing to tolerate the abuse to his member base, the best we can do is just ignore Aurel and maybe over time he will just go away.
There are reasons he is banned from most forums. ;) What is sad though, is you have at least two other forums that are complaining about his behavior on the OB forums.
-
I am in favour of free speech, but when a thread becomes destructive, it will be given a very short lifespan.
I think this benefits our community in the long term. I am not in favour of banning anyone.
-
I am in favour of free speech ...
Seems Aurel has taken FREE to all aspects of his computing life. I don't claim to be Sherlock Holmes but it's obvious Aurel doesn't p(l)ay be the rules. My guess is he uses a bootleg copy of XP (only uses free AV and doesn't qualify for MS registered user products) and steals internet access. (AB, O2 and SB sites trackers report him using different IPs on various subnets along with his interest in WIFI antenna design) He has no friends (spends all his time on forums making virtual people miserable) because anyone local will have nothing to do with him. When banned from a forum he creates a new one of his own. (you got it, free forums sites) I have tried all methods I know of to help him focus and get along with others but I think I finally run into someone that is truly hopeless.
-
I am in favour of free speech, but when a thread becomes destructive, it will be given a very short lifespan.
I think this benefits our community in the long term. I am not in favour of banning anyone.
It is a bit myopic to consider trolling and personal attacks as free speech. Neither are a benefit to any community and are quite destructive to the community and product associated with it.
-
Seems Aurel has taken FREE to all aspects of his computing life. I don't claim to be Sherlock Holmes but it's obvious Aurel doesn't p(l)ay be the rules. My guess is he uses a bootleg copy of XP (only uses free AV and doesn't qualify for MS registered user products) and steals internet access. (AB, O2 and SB sites trackers report him using different IPs on various subnets along with his interest in WIFI antenna design) He has no friends (spends all his time on forums making virtual people miserable) because anyone local will have nothing to do with him. When banned from a forum he creates a new one of his own. (you got it, free forums sites) I have tried all methods I know of to help him focus and get along with others but I think I finally run into someone that is truly hopeless.
You left out stealing code and claiming it as his. I never have and never will tolerate Aurel's abuse. Since there are personal attacks against me by Aurel on this forum and Charles is okay with that and seems to support it, then nobody will have a problem when Aurel gets hit with both barrels. The only way to deal with a bully is punch him in the nose.
-
The only way to deal with a bully is punch him in the nose.
That approach with Aurel quickly escalates to vulgarities and childish name calling as his response. (in broken English to make it worse)
I think ignoring him is the best way to get results. I propose that no one (except Charles) respond to Aurel in the upcoming month of January. If things don't get better, we will extend it for another month until he does.
-
I propose that no one (except Charles) respond to Aurel
John ...
finally something smart from you... ;)
Of course there are other two guys
Peter & Frank
;)
-
That approach with Aurel quickly escalates to vulgarities and childish name calling as his response. (in broken English to make it worse)
I think ignoring him is the best way to get results. I propose that no one (except Charles) respond to Aurel in the upcoming month of January. If things don't get better, we will extend it for another month until he does.
The very first thing I looked for when I joined the forum was the ignore feature. Unfortunately, there isn't one. Will have to do it old-school.
-
The very first thing I looked for when I joined the forum was the ignore feature. Unfortunately, there isn't one. Will have to do it old-school.
I think that the ignore feature is a SMF 2 feature. I may briefly look at Aurel's posts for the entertainment value but have no plans to help or respond to his posts going forward.
-
I may briefly look at Aurel's posts for the entertainment value but have no plans to help or respond to his posts going forward.
I could not agree, more.