if I had conditions, even not being a programmer I would make a donation, even being an attempt to have something more explained,
Charles Pegge's proposal is wonderful, to give freedom and power to the programmer and not imposed rules.
I think he wants to gain something from his legacy, and who does not want to?
I think significant donations would come from small developers,
but it would have to have a clearer proposal regarding the purpose of O2, rules and possibilities
also a certain direction,
for example, who wants syntax C goes straight to C,
who visits the forum and lowers O2 is by Basic, so the tips and examples have that is more focused on the basic, making clear that it accepts the C syntax, it can be rather a curvature of learning from one to the other,
I see from what I read in the forum that even the most experienced have doubts that Charles responds, but many answers work for those who already have a time in the use of O2 and is experienced in the area, but for curious or beginners in the majority doubt only increases,
and you can not answer every little doubt, most do not have the courage to post the doubt and ends up leaving the O2 aside
I see many advanced examples, but for those who can not use an array will not be worth much,
O2 could be of great use to me and for many who just want to create one or another dll or exe,
"Just my opinion of little value"
