Author Topic: a case for architectural change in oxygen?  (Read 19932 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Charles Pegge

  • Guest
Re: a case for architectural change in oxygen?
« Reply #60 on: August 07, 2012, 10:59:48 PM »

My concern is that QT is rather large for a dependency. I would like to have some controls and dialogs written in Oxygen, and encourage users to develop their own from source. If the controls  use OpenGl, they will not be MS dependent, but keeping the low-level graphics in a distinct layer will also help.

QML looks interesting.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QML

Charles


Aurel

  • Guest
Re: a case for architectural change in oxygen?
« Reply #61 on: August 07, 2012, 11:35:54 PM »
Heh...
QML is sort of JavaScript layered with QT framework which is massive.
I will bet that Peter can make some sort of presentation like this with hes win.inc.
But he need one more GUI transparent window as editor .
I am not interested in Rpi at all ,i will rather digg my old ZXSpectrum ;D